For several years I have been railing against those who wish to restrict the FDA from exerting proper control over the many so-called “nutritional supplements” that are promoted with exaggerated hype to unsuspecting consumers. As a result of limited or absence of vetting of these products, all sorts of mischief has been visited on our public, ranging from toxicity that is inadequately reported to this agency, surreptitious inclusion of illegal components, and even inclusion of virtually nothing but sawdust or grass (unfortunately, not the fun kind!) into many of their products. But the power of the FDA has been hamstrung by those who wish to restrict government—which, to many, is a dirty word—from providing the public with adequate protection. Legislators accomplish this through limiting the funding, size, and powers of the FDA, allowing many unscrupulous “supplement” producers to literally run amuck and produce untold misery and financial burden on an unsuspecting public, all for the latters” monetary gain. A few examples of such malfeasance are presented in one of my recent posts: http://www.mortontavel.com/2015/10/22
But spelling this out on a more global scale, I quote a recent post by my cousin, Sheila Kennedy, a modern day muckraker, who makes the following comments with which I could not agree more:
For the past 30+ years, self-described “small government” conservatives have waged a propaganda war on the legitimacy of the state. While that war has rarely been as explicit as Grover Norquist’s famous threat to make government “small enough to drown in a bathtub,” or as intentional as the campaign I blogged about yesterday, the constant focus has been on what government does badly and the constant refrain has been that “we don’t need no stinkin’ government telling us to [fill in the blank].
Let’s stipulate that, yes, there are many things government at all levels does badly, and yes, we need to monitor its operations and correct its mistakes. Yes, there are good forms of government and oppressive forms, and thoughtful citizens should opt for—and attempt to institute— the former. But that is very different from the irresponsible attacks on the very existence of established political authority.
The shock that has accompanied the water crisis in Flint, Michigan demonstrates the extent to which even the most anti-government among us depend upon a well-functioning bureaucracy—not to mention the extent to which ill-considered ideological decision-making poses a very real threat to the well-being of citizens. (Especially citizens who lack the means to remove themselves from the polity and retreat into privileged enclaves where they can pay for clean water and other “amenities.”)
There’s a lot that might be said about Flint’s situation, and a lot of blame to go around, but the lesson to be learned goes well beyond the idiocy of “penny wise, pound foolish,” stubbornly ideological policies, or even official misconduct.
America is no longer a country of family farmers and small merchants scattered along the eastern seacoast. The overwhelming majority of Americans no longer grow and preserve our own food or draw our water from a pristine nearby creek. Cars and factories discharge pollutants into our air, airplanes criss-cross the skies, and we live in densely populated cities where—among other things— we can’t just toss our garbage out the back door. The list is endless.
American citizens are utterly dependent on the institutions of government to provide services we cannot effectively or efficiently provide for ourselves. We expect government to assign air lanes so our planes don’t crash into each other, to inspect the foods we buy at the local grocery so we don’t get ill, to prevent the local factory from discharging its toxic waste into our waterways so we don’t drink contaminants, and much more.
The private sector cannot protect even the richest gated communities from polluted air.
There are certainly areas of our communal life where government need not and should not intervene. Debates about the necessity and/or propriety of programs and initiatives is entirely appropriate, as is criticism of poor performance of government agencies or officials.
When self-serving political rhetoric encourages our dimmer citizens to fear a “government invasion” of Texas, when the slightest effort to curtail gun violence sets off hysterical accusations of “confiscation,” when loony-tunes cowboys try to “take back” land held in trust for the benefit of all citizens, when efforts to ensure equal treatment of the nation’s more marginalized groups is rejected by zealots who claim exemption from the laws of the land “because God,” we have not only weakened the bonds of citizenship, we have endangered our own safety and well-being.
If we don’t retreat from our bipolar “government bad/private good” approach to complicated issues, there will be a lot more people drinking brown, lead-filled water and breathing toxic air.
Among other things.
These comments, and many others, can be found on her website: http://sheilakennedy.net/2016/01/food-water-air-and-government/